Allowed

Kailash Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jun 2020CR. MISC./10270/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for dacoity and arms offences, on a personal bond due to the COVID-19 pandemic, directing a monetary bond within a specified timeframe once normalcy was restored.

What did the court decide?

Directed release on personal bond to C.J.M. Banka; ordered to furnish monetary bail bond with two sureties within four weeks of normalcy.

Kailash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10270 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2018 Thana- CHANDAN District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KAILASH YADAV, aged about 26 years (Male), Son of Mohan Yadav, Resident of Village Muhalla - Malchak, P.S.- Harpur, District- Munger.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Sanjiv Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr.Lalan Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 01-06-2020

¶12

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶13

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For

¶14

Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶16

A.P.P. for the State.

¶17

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences under Sections 399, 402 of the IPC and 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶18

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 18.10.2018 during the night patrolling, the informant apprehended coaccused Rupesh Kumar Singh and Mithun Kumar and recovered arms from their possession. Co-accused Mithun Kumar disclosed that this petitioner was also with them and they were planning to commit dacoity on the strength of fire arms.

¶19

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10270 of 2020(3) dt.01-06-2020 2/2

¶21

the petitioner is in custody since 30.08.2019 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. No arms is alleged to have been recovered from possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come in the present case on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused Mithun Kumar.

¶22

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Banka in connection with G.R. No. 3527 of 2018, arising out of Chandan P.S. Case No. 171 of 2018.

¶24

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of four weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶25

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶26

U.K./- U T

Kailash Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Fatima Rose Karketa @ Fatima Rose Kerketta Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Anthu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bishambher Das Vs the State of Bihar

Anant Kumar @ Chittar Vs The State of Bihar