Jai Prakash Yadav v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a 2017 criminal case alleging assault and arson arising from a family partition dispute. The Court emphasized the lack of criminal antecedents and the existence of counter-cases.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners directed to surrender within eight weeks and furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17775 of 2020
Arising Out of P.S. Case No.-9 Year-2017 Thana- SIGAUDI District- Patna
======================================================
- JAI PRAKASH YADAV Son of Vijay Yadav Resident of VillageMasurchak, P.S.- Kalpa, District- Jehanabad.
- Sudhir Yadav Son of Vijay Yadav Resident of Village- Masurchak, P.S.Kalpa, District- Jehanabad.
- Vijay Yadav Son of Baliram Yadav Resident of Village- Masurchak, P.S.Kalpa, District- Jehanabad.
- Lalu Yadav @ Lalu Kumar Son of Gorakh Yadav Resident of VillageMasurchak, P.S.- Kalpa, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail in a case involving family dispute over partition alleged armed assault and arson?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jai Prakash Yadav and others
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Partha Sarthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court