The Patna High Court heard an application where the sole petitioner sought to withdraw the petition due to his subsequent arrest during its pendency, which was allowed.
Permission to withdraw the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13502 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2019 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya
======================================================
Ritu Raj Singh Son of Late Anirudh Singh Resident of Village - Bishnubigha, P.S.- Gurua, Dist.- Gaya (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saket Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr.Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
3 10-12-2020
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
that during pendency of this application the sole petitioner has been arrested and as such he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
In view of the above, the application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Prakash/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present application should be allowed to continue after the arrest of the petitioner.
Ritu Raj Singh
The State Of Bihar
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
