Allowed

Awadh Lal Yadav @ Bhulani v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jun 2020CR. MISC./16895/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner on his personal bond. The court directed him to furnish monetary bail bonds and sureties once normalcy is restored due to COVID-19 lockdown restrictions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to be released on personal bond pending restoration of normalcy, with a direction to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with sureties within four weeks thereafter.

Awadh Lal Yadav @ Bhulani Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16895 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2017 Thana- ADHAOURA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AWADH LAL YADAV @ BHULANI Son of Teju Singh Resident of Village - Saleya, P.S.- Adhaura, District- Kaimur at Bhabua

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prem Kumar Jha ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 03-06-2020

¶14

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being

¶15

taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶16

The matter has been listed under the heading “For

¶17

Orders” under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶19

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

The prosecution case in short is that while the informant was coming on motorcycle, he was abducted and was taken to the forest by some unknown persons.

¶21

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 09-07-2019. Charge

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16895 of 2020(2) dt.03-06-2020 2/2

¶23

sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. In course of investigation, some of the witnesses stated that the petitioner was seen with the victim. The petitioner has not been put on TIP to ascertain as to whether he had participated in the alleged occurrence or not. The victim has already been recovered.

¶24

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶25

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge , Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Sessions Trial No. 180 of 2019 arising out of Adhaura P.S. Case No. 78 of 2017.

¶26

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of four weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶27

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶28

A.K.V.//- U T

Awadh Lal Yadav @ Bhulani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Awadh Lal Yadav @ Bhulani v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Sonar Vs the State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Seraj @ Md. Siraj Vs The State of Bihar

Ranvir Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Chandra Shekhar Kumar Singh @ Chandra Shekhar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Babu Sahni Vs the State of Bihar