Allowed

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2020CR. MISC./16338/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing charges under Section 498A IPC, subject to the condition that he deposit Rs. 7,000 monthly to his wife in her bank account as an interim maintenance measure until the final decision in the matrimonial dispute.

What did the court decide?

Release of Santosh Kumar on anticipatory bail subject to the condition of depositing Rs. 7,000/- per month in the wife's bank account.

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16338 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-702 Year-2019 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANTOSH KUMAR Son of Badri Narayan Resident of Village - Bandachak, P.O. - Khanwan, P.S. - Narhat, District - Nawada.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Kanchan Kumari D/O Ramkhelawan Resident of Village - Kanungo Bigha, P.O. - Ankari, P.S. - Narhat, District - Nawada.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Soni Srivastava, Mr. Upendra Yadav, Advocates For the State : Mrs. Sucheta Yadav, APP For the Opposite Party No. 2: Mr. Arjun Prasad, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

5 16-12-2020 Heard Mrs. Soni Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Arjun Prasad, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No. 2 and Mrs. Sucheta Yadav, Additional Public Prosecutor for the state through video conferencing.

¶13

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 702/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The allegation, as per Complaint Petition, is that the marriage of Opposite Party No. 2 was solemnized with the petitioner in the year 2007 and there is allegation that the petitioner and his family members tortured the complainant

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16338 of 2020(5) dt.16-12-2020 2/4

¶16

mentally and physically due to non fulfillment of demand of dowry. This Court, vide its order dated 21.10.2020, in order to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, had given an opportunity to the petitioner to visit the parental house of his wife to bring her along with him in her matrimonial home and live peacefully as husband and wife.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance thereof, petitioner had visited the parental house of his wife on 24.11.2020 and waited outside the house approximately for an hour but there was no response from the side of his wife and his wife did not come out of her house. Learned counsel further submits that out of wedlock one child was born, who is now four years old, and is suffering from some neurological problem and needs continuous treatment. Learned counsel fairly submits that petitioner is ready and willing to pay a sum of Rs. 7000/- per month to the Opposite Party No.2 i.e., his wife, as living cost, subject to the final order, if any, passed in Matrimonial Case for maintenance and decided between the parties.

¶18

On the other hand, learned counsel for OP No.2 subject to the final outcome of this case, accepts the offer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16338 of 2020(5) dt.16-12-2020 3/4

¶20

Having regard to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the material on record and the fact that the offer made by the petitioner has been accepted by OP No. 2, the complainant, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the condition that he will deposit a sum of Rs. 7,000/- (Seven Thousand), per month, regularly, starting from January 2021 in the bank account of OP No.2 and the learned counsel appearing for OP No.2 will provide bank account number of OP No.2 to the petitioner within a period of ten days and the amount shall be deposited by the petitioner in the account of OP No.2 by 7^th day of every month.

¶21

It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bond, the proof of deposit of Rs. 7000/- for the month of January 2021 shall be produced by the petitioner before the court concerned.

¶22

In view of the above, petitioner, SANTOSH KUMAR shall be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks, subject to the aforesaid condition, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ms. Aditi Kumari, learned Judicial Magistrate 2^nd

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16338 of 2020(5) dt.16-12-2020 4/4

¶24

Class, Nawada/concerned court in connection with Complaint Case No. 702/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) CrPC.

¶25

It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bond all the parties shall follow the guidelines of social distancing.

¶26

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶27

perwez

¶28

U T

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punit Rai @ Punit Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Aatesh Kumar @ Sarkar Vs The State of Bihar

Prince Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Krishn Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Babloo Jha @ Rajesh Kumar Babloo Vs The State of Bihar

Anita Devi Vs The State of Bihar