Anita Devi v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous for petitioner 1 (arrested) and as withdrawn for petitioner 2.
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
Application dismissed as infructuous for petitioner 1 (arrested) and as withdrawn for petitioner 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29530 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2019 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit For the informant : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 16-12-2020
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State, through Video Conferencing.
Learned Counsel for the petitioners informs that petitioner No. 1, Anita Devi, has been arrested by the police during the pendency of this application and this application, so far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, has, now, become infructuous.
Accordingly, this application, so far as petitioner no. 1, Anita Devi, is concerned, is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29530 of 2020(2) dt.16-12-2020 2/2
So far as petitioner no. 2, Rakesh Mahto @ Bablu Mahato @ Rakesh Kumar Mahto is concerned, learned Counsel, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is granted.
This application, so far as petitioner no. 2 is
concerned, is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-
U √ T √
Anita Devi
Rakesh Mahto
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court