Nurudin Miyan and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In an oral order, the Patna High Court dismissed the application for non-prosecution due to the absence of petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16192 of 2015
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2188 Year-2013 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy-I, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Hence, this application, filed against the order dated
12.08.2014 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in Trial No. 3647 of 2015 arising out of Complaint Case No. 2188 of 2013, is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Kundan/-
U T
Nurudin Miyan and others
The State of Bihar and Bhola Miyan
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court