Allowed

Shiv Nandan Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jan 2020CR. MISC./85210/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in an FIR related to forging affidavits and giving false evidence, subject to conditions and cooperation with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail in Kotwali P.S. Case No.464 of 2017 by furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of like amount each.

Shiv Nandan Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85210 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-464 Year-2017 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shiv Nandan Prasad Yadav S/o Late Karamlal Yadav @ Late Karn Lal Yadav Resident of Chandra Vihar Colony, Ashiyana Nagar, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, District- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Registrar General, Hon'ble Patna High Court, Patna Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 07-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 181, 193, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

One Ramu Yadav had sworn false affidavit in Cr.Misc.No.36406 of 2013 and Cr.Misc.No.2084 of 2014 stating therein that Kailash Kumar, son of the present petitioner had not married with any other lady. On detection of the aforesaid false statement, enquiry was made by the learned Registrar General and during enquiry Ramu Yadav stated that on the instruction of this petitioner, he had made such statement. The Registrar

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85210 of 2019(2) dt.07-01-2020 2/2

¶14

General was of the view that false statement was made by Ramu Yadav and consequence of false statement was known to him, hence he has taken evasive plea.

¶15

On the basis of statement of Ramu Yadav, the petitioner has also been arrayed as accused in the case.

¶16

Considering the entire facts, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Patna in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No.464 of 2017 arising out of G.R.No.6033 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as well as condition that the petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶17

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶18

B.Kr./-

¶19

U T

Shiv Nandan Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Nandan Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Mandal @ Pradeep Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Rasbihari Arya @ Rambihari Arya Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Babita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Dr. R. S. Nagmani Vs the State of Bihar