Allowed

Sumit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jan 2020CR. MISC./1231/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter concerning bail, the single-judge bench granted regular bail to the petitioner who was accused under sections 413, 414 of the IPC and sections 25, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The court noted no arms were recovered from the petitioner. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of 10,000/- with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on regular bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the C.J.M., Vaishali (Hajipur).

Sumit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1231 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-783 Year-2019 Thana- HAJIPUR District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUMIT KUMAR Son of Sunil Yadav Resident of Village - Loha ka Pul Mansaram Ka Akhara, P.S.- Mehandiganj, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satrudhan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-01-2020

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 783 of 2019, G.R. No. 4884 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶15

The allegation is regarding the police having intercepted one tempo and arrested three miscreants including the petitioner herein and as far as the co-accused person namely, Rousan Kumar is concerned, one country made pistol was recovered, however, no arms are stated to have been recovered from this petitioner.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1231 of 2020(2) dt.17-01-2020 2/2

¶18

that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is having a clean antecedent and is languishing in custody since 29.08.2019.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, coupled with the fact that no illegal arms have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, I deem it fit and proper to direct for release of the petitioners on regular bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali (Hajipur) in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 783 of 2019, G.R. No. 4884 of 2019.

¶21

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶22

Tiwary/-

¶23

U T

Sumit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radhika Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Awadhesh Das Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Kumar Vs The State of Bihar