Allowed

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Chaudhari v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 May 2020CR. MISC./10569/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a prosecution case for offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, observing that no recovery was made from his possession or house and he had no criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount, or provisionally on personal bond pending lockdown.

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Chaudhari Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10569 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2019 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Chaudhari Son of Rajvansh Chaudhari Resident of Village - Jangal Mahal, P.S.- Kargahar, District- Rohtas (Bihar)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR ====================	... .. =====================	. Opposite Party/s =============
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================	Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh =====================	=============
CORAM: HONOURABL SRIVASTAVA	E MR. JUSTICE HEMANT	KUMAR

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

5 13-05-2020

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as

¶11

well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

¶12

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 135 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

Taking into consideration that alleged recovery has not been made either from the possession of the petitioner or from his house rather the said recovery is said to be made from an open place and, furthermore, the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Rohtas at Sasaram/concerned

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10569 of 2020(5) dt.13-05-2020 2/2

¶15

court in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 135 of 2019.

¶16

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to make available sureties due to lock down as well as due to prevailing situation, the concerned court shall release the petitioner provisionally on personal bond with condition that petitioner shall furnish the sureties when lock down is over.

¶17

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶18

Spd/-

¶19

U T

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Chaudhari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Chaudhari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Hareram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Sahni @ Bhutti Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sattar @ Saddam Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Choudhari Vs The State of Bihar