Allowed

Hareram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 May 2020CR. MISC./75339/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court released the petitioner on bail in connection with a criminal case involving recovery of illicit liquor. The court ordered bail bonds with sureties but allowed provisional release on personal bond if sureties could not be produced due to the lockdown.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with bonds of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties; alternatively, released provisionally on personal bond if sureties unavailable due to lockdown.

Hareram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75339 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2019 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

HARERAM YADAV Son of Radha Yadav @ Raja Yadav Resident of Village - Ahiyapur, P.S.- Gopalpur, Distt.- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vyas Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 12-05-2020

¶13

Heard Mr Vyas Kumar Mishra learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State through video conferencing.

¶14

Petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 25.09.2019 in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2019 on the charges that he was found sitting in a car from which 225 litre country made liquor was recovered.

¶15

Submission on behalf of the petitioner is that petitioner is neither owner nor driver of the said car and moreover, except one criminal antecedent, there is nothing against the petitioner.

¶16

Although, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75339 of 2019(3) dt.12-05-2020 2/2

¶18

opposed the prayer but considering the period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum Special Judge, Excise, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalpur P.S. Case No. 22 of 2019.

¶19

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to make available sureties due to lockdown as well as due to prevailing situation, the concerned court shall release the petitioner provisionally on personal bond with condition that petitioner shall furnish the sureties when lockdown is over.

¶20

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶21

shahzad/-

¶22

U T

Hareram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hareram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Sahni @ Bhutti Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sattar @ Saddam Vs The State of Bihar