Allowed

Santosh Sharma @ Santosh Verma v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Dec 2020CR. APP (SJ)/1844/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal by the appellant aggrieved by the rejection of bail. Setting aside the impugned order, the Court granted bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 20.08.2020 set aside; appellant released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Santosh Sharma @ Santosh Verma Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1844 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2017 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANTOSH SHARMA @ SANTOSH VERMA Son of Kiskindha Sah Resident of Village - Sirsawan, Naya Tola, P.S. - Daraunda, District - Siwan.

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 01-12-2020

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the

¶11

State.

¶12

The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 20.08.2020 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-I-cumSpecial Judge, SC/ST Act, Siwan in Daraunda P.S. Case No. 131 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 147, 341, 342, 323, 308 and 304 IPC and Sections 3(2) (v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby prayer for grant of regular on behalf of the appellant has been rejected.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant would submit that the appellant has no criminal antecedent. The present case is concocted story hatched up by the police. In fact, the victim died in police custody although the police was

¶14

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1844 of 2020(2) dt.01-12-2020 2/2

¶15

informed about the fact that one thief was apprehended by the villagers but after inordinate delay the police reached the place of occurrence and thereafter the thief was beaten by the villagers. The thief was taken to the hospital who died there and as such, the appellant, who was unaware of the caste and details of the victim cannot be fastened with the liability of SC/ST Act. The appellant is in custody since 19.05.2020.

¶16

Considering the totality of the fact situation, the impugned order dated 20.08.2020 is set aside and the appeal is, accordingly, allowed.

¶17

Let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum- Special Judge SC/ST Act, Siwan in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case No. 131 of 2017.

¶18

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶19

spandey/-

¶20

U T

Santosh Sharma @ Santosh Verma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Sharma @ Santosh Verma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Om Prakash Vs The State of Bihar

Indradeo Kurmi Vs The State of Bihar

Jagia Kuwar @ Jagiya Kunwar Vs The State of Bihar

Sitesh Pathak @ Jhuman Pathak Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Yadav @ Manish Yadav Vs The State of Bihar