Dismissed

Indradeo Kurmi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Nov 2020CWJC/8291/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking directions for safety and security regarding harvesting of agricultural products, granting liberty to approach the District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police for action under relevant laws.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to approach District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police, Kaimur for appropriate action under relevant law.

Indradeo Kurmi Vs The State of Bihar — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8291 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Indradeo Kurmi, Male, aged about 73 years, son of late Govind Kurmi

¶4

Muneshwar Kumar, Male, aged about 45 years, son of late Kariman Kurmi, both R/O Village – Jailpur Klan, P.S. - Bhagwanpur, District – Kaimur (Bhabhua).

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary Revue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Kaimur, Bhabhua

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Kaimur, Bhabhua.

¶10

The Sub Divisional Officer, Kaimur, Bhabhua.

¶11

The Circle Officer, Bhagwanpur, Kaimur &

¶12

The Station House Officer, Bhagwanpur, Kaimur, Bhabhua.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dudh Nath Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag)

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 27-11-2020

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the State.

¶21

Petitioners have filed the present writ application for following reliefs:-

¶22

“(i) For issuance of direction/ directions or order/ orders or writ/ writs particularly in the nature of mandamus for commanding and directing the respondent authority to provide safety and security for harvesting and take away agricultural products from their land without any disturbance/ hindrance from extremist/ Lal Salam.

¶23

(ii) For any other incidental and consequential relief

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.8291 of 2020(2) dt.27-11-2020 2/2

¶25

to which these petitioners found fit under the fact and circumstances of this case.”

¶26

Counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have approached the concerned authority but the authority is sitting tight over the matter and no action was taken as yet.

¶27

Considering the nature of grievance raised in the writ application, the writ application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate and the Superintendent of Police, Kaimur at Bhabhua for appropriate action under the provisions of relevant law.

¶28

The Court hope and trust that the same will protect interest of the subject in accordance with law.

¶29

The writ application stands disposed of.

¶30

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶31

B.Kr./-Ravi

¶32

Indradeo Kurmi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indradeo Kurmi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagia Kuwar @ Jagiya Kunwar Vs The State of Bihar

Lakshman Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakash Vs The State of Bihar

Sitesh Pathak @ Jhuman Pathak Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Paswan Vs The State of Bihar