Allowed

Jiut Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Oct 2020CR. APP (SJ)/1415/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal appeal against rejection of regular bail. The High Court allowed the appeal, noting a neighbourhood dispute, simple injuries, and custody duration, setting aside the lower court order and directing release on bail.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 08.05.2020 rejected in bail was set aside; appellants directed to be released on regular bail upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties.

Jiut Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1415 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2020 Thana- SC/ST BETTIAH District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JIUT SAH Son of Sri Budhan Sah Resident of Village - Dharampur, P.S.Sathi, Distt.- West Champaran.

¶5

Krishna Sah Son of Sri Jiut Sah Resident of Village - Dharampur, P.S.Sathi, Distt.- West Champaran.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 09-10-2020 Heard Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned counsel for the

¶12

appellants and Mr. Binay Krishna, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the State through video conferencing.

¶13

The present appeal is directed against the order dated 08.05.2020 passed by learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judgecum-Special Judge, S.C. & S.T. Act, West Champaran, Bettiah in Bail Petition No. 1067 of 2020 arising out of Bettiah S.C. / S.T. P.S. Case No. 07 of 2020 registered under Section 341, 323, 324, 427, 504, 354-B, 337 / 34 of the I.P.C., Section 3 (i)(r)(ii) (v-a) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by which the prayer for regular bail of the appellants has been rejected.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1415 of 2020(2) dt.09-10-2020 2/3

¶15

The allegation against the appellants is that the appellant no.- 1 along with other accused persons abused the sister and sister- in- law of the informant by their caste name and also assaulted them and tried to outrage their modesty. The allegation against appellant no. – 2 is that he assaulted the informant by means of peg on his head.

¶16

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that both the parties are neighbours, there is dispute between them with regard to passage in which the side of the informant had erected a peg. Learned counsel further submits that the appellants have not committed any offence in the manner alleged and they have falsely been implicated in this case due to enmity between the parties. Learned counsel referring to Annexure – 2 to this appeal submits that injuries caused to the informant have been found to be simple in nature. Learned counsel also submits that appellants are in custody since 19.03.2020.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the materials available on record, the fact that both the parties are neighbours, there appears to be a dispute between them regarding passage, the injuries are simple in nature and the appellants are in custody since 19.03.2020, this appeal is allowed and the order dated 08.05.2020 passed by

¶18

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1415 of 2020(2) dt.09-10-2020 3/3

¶19

learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge- cum-Special Judge, SC & ST Act, West Champaran, Bettiah in Bail Petition No. 1067 of 2020 is set aside.

¶20

Accordingly, the appellants, above named, are directed to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge - cum-Special Judge, SC & ST Act, West Champaran, Bettiah / court concerned in connection with Bettiah SC / ST P.S. Case No. 07 of 2020.

¶21

It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bonds all the parties shall follow the guidelines regarding lockdown and social distancing.

¶22

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶23

praful/-

¶24

U T

Jiut Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jiut Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tanveer Hussain @ Dablu Mian Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Gajendra Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Manu Bhagat @ Manu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lalji Patel Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shamim @ Amua Driver Vs The State of Bihar