Allowed

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Oct 2020CR. MISC./24866/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order dismisses the anticipatory bail application of petitioner no.3 as withdrawn due to his arrest. For the remaining petitioners, the High Court grants anticipatory bail in an FIR under IPC 302/34 alleging death during land dispute, noting police had submitted a final report citing lack of evidence.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to petitioners 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 in Gamharia PS Case No. 128/2019 subject to bail bond and sureties; bail application of petitioner 3 dismissed as withdrawn.

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24866 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2019 Thana- GAMAHARIYA District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJAY YADAV S/o Devan Yadav Resident of Village-Ekwa, P.S.Gamharia, District-Madhepura.

¶5

Sitaram Yadav S/o Laddu Yadav Resident of Village-Kamalijari, P.S.Gamharia, District-Madhepura.

¶6

Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav S/o Sitaram Yadav Resident of Village-Kamalijari, P.S.-Gamharia, District-Madhepura.

¶7

Nitish Yadav @ Nitish Kumar S/o Sitaram Yadav Resident of VillageKamalijai, P.S.-Gamharia, District-Madhepura.

¶8

Bhuvan Kumar @ Bhushan Yadav @ Bhubhan Yadav S/o Sitaram Yadav Resident of Village-Kamalijari, P.S.-Gamharia, District-Madhepura.

¶9

Shivram Yadav @ Shivram Kumar S/o Shatrughan Yadav Resident of Village-Ratanpur, P.S.-Ghailardh, District-Madhepura.

¶10

Chandan @ Chandan Yadav @ Bausuk Yadav S/o Late Domi Yadav @ Teni Yadav Resident of Village-Etwa Kamalijari, P.S.-Gamharia, DistrictMadhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr.Rakesh Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 08-10-2020 Heard Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, learned senior counsel

¶18

for the petitioners and Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, Additional Public Prosecutor for the state through video conferencing.

¶19

Learned senior counsel submits that during pendency of this application, petitioner no.3, Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav has been arrested and accordingly, this application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous as

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24866 of 2020(2) dt.08-10-2020 2/4

¶21

against petitioner no.3.

¶22

As such, learned senior counsel seeks permission to withdraw this application for anticipatory bail in connection with petitioner no.3, Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav.

¶23

The permission is accorded and the application for anticipatory bail in connection with petitioner no.3, Pradeep Yadav @ Pradeep Kumar Yadav is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶24

Petitioners no. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 apprehend their arrest in connection with Gamharia PS Case No. 128/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the IPC.

¶25

The allegation against the petitioners, as per FIR, is that the informant along with deceased, Ravindra Yadav had gone for irrigating his land, meanwhile, all the accused persons including these petitioners arrived there, started assaulting and abused them leading to the death of Ravindra Yadav.

¶26

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and there is general and omnibus allegation against all the petitioners. Learned counsel further submits that during course of investigation, several witnesses have stated that due to thundering and lightening the deceased had died and the said

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24866 of 2020(2) dt.08-10-2020 3/4

¶28

witnesses further disclosed that due to land dispute between the parties, these petitioners were implicated in this case.

¶29

Learned counsel next submits that the police, after investigation, submitted the final form and due to lack of evidence, the petitioners were not sent for trial. However, learned court below differed with the final form and took cognizance against these petitioners.

¶30

It is further submitted that postmortem report does not support the prosecution story.

¶31

Having regard to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the material on record and the fact that police, after investigation, submitted the final form and due to lack of evidence, the petitioners were not sent for trial, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶32

Accordingly, petitioners no.1, SANJAY YADAV, 2. SITARAM YADAV, 4. NITISH YADAV @ NITISH KUMAR, 5. BHUVAN KUMAR @ BHUSHAN YADAV @ BHUBHAN YADAV, 6. SHIVRAM YADAV @ SHIVRAM KUMAR and 7. CHANDAN @ CHANDAN YADAV @ BAUSUK YADAV respectively, shall be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)

¶33

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24866 of 2020(2) dt.08-10-2020 4/4

¶34

each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Smt. Surabhi Srivastava, Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Madhepura in connection with Gamharia PS Case No. 128/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) CrPC.

¶35

It is made clear that at the time of furnishing bail bonds all the parties shall follow the guidelines regarding lockdown and social distancing.

¶36

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶37

perwez

¶38

U T

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jay Dayal Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Nipu Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Shobha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Tanveer Hussain @ Dablu Mian Vs the State of Bihar

Gajendra Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Niraj Singh Vs The State of Bihar