Pa1tner allowed permission to withdraw Civil Review No. 50 of 2017, with liberty to file a petition for restoration of the second appeal that had been dismissed for limitation.
Prayer to withdraw the petition with liberty to file for restoration of S.A. No. 102 of 2014 was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.50 of 2017 In
Second Appeal No.102 of 2014
====================================================== Sakaldeo Yadav ... ... Petitioner/s Versus Rajeshwar Yadav ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manish Kumar No 13 For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
3 03-01-2019
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file petition for restoration of S.A. No. 102 of 2014, which was dismissed on account of dismissal of limitation petition.
Prayer is allowed.
This Civil Review petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
BKS/-
U
Sakaldeo Yadav
Rajeshwar Yadav
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
