A Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case filed for restoration of an Interim Application was dismissed as the petitioner failed to appear before the Court to press the plea, resulting in non-compliance of prior orders.
Dismissal of the restoration petition due to absence of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.59 of 2017
In
Second Appeal No.285 of 2015
====================================================== Surendra Prasad & Ors
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Ajay Kumar & Ors
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Yogendra Prasad Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 02-01-2019
This M.J.C. is filed for restoration of I.A. No.1393
of 2016 which was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 19.10.2016.
I.A. No.1393 of 2016 was filed for restraining the respondents from alienating or selling the suit land till the disposal of the appeal but nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this restoration petition.
Accordingly, this restoration petition is dismissed.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
Saurabh/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a restoration petition filed under miscellaneous jurisdiction in an appeal should be allowed in absence of the petitioner.
Surendra Prasad & Ors
Ajay Kumar & Ors
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
