Allowed

Himanshu Kumar @ Himanshu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Dec 2018CR. MISC./75588/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna, hearing a criminal miscellaneous application for anticipatory bail, directed that the petitioner be granted bail if he surrenders within four weeks, subject to furnishing a bail bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on surrender within four weeks by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Himanshu Kumar @ Himanshu Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.75588 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2017 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Himanshu Kumar @ Himanshu Mahto Son of Madheshwar Mahto Resident of Village-Lalabhadsara,P.S. Dulhin Bazar,Distt.-Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 21-12-2018 Heard both sides.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Dulhin Bazar P.S. case No. 306 of 2017 registered under Section 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of Arms Act.

¶13

The informant, brother of deceased, named 13 persons and alleged that all the accused persons surrounded the informant and his family members and when they started fleeing away the accused persons caught Yash Narayan Sharma, brother of informant, and on the order of Amar Prakash Yadav, Dinesh Mahto shot his brother dead.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of petitioner figured in the case in the confessional statement of co-accused Mukesh Kumar @ Laddu. Mukesh Kumar has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 03.05.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17705 of 2018. Even the order giver, Amar Prakash Yadav, has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 25.04.2018

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75588 of 2018(2) dt.21-12-2018 2/2

¶16

passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24738 of 2018.

¶17

Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of allegation made against the petitioner and the fact that although informant made specific allegation against 13 named persons that they surrounded the informant and his brother and Dinesh Yadav fired causing the death of brother of informant but the informant did not name the petitioner and Mukesh Yadav @ Laddu, who disclosed the name of petitioner, has already been granted bail, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Danapur, Patna in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. case No. 306 of 2017, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶19

BKS/-

¶20

U T

Himanshu Kumar @ Himanshu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Himanshu Kumar @ Himanshu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Goutam Kumar Manjhi @ Goutam Manjhi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Indu Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Shabanam and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shiv Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Naim Ansari @ Naim Vs The State Of Bihar

Shams Tabrez Vs The State Of Bihar