Oral contempt order disposing of a petition for liberty to challenge a rejection order. Court granted liberty to challenge the impugned order of the Managing Director and disposed of the petition.
The contempt petition was disposed of as not pressed, with liberty to challenge the order of the Managing Director.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5059 of 2018
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7977 of 2018
======================================================
Amleshwar Prasad, Son of Surendra Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Amber Sristal, P.S.- Sadar, District- Nalanda at Biharsharif.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
3 10-07-2019 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to challenge the order passed by the Chairman, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., by which the case of the petitioner has been rejected.
Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands disposed off as not pressed, however with liberty to challenge
Patna High Court MJC No.5059 of 2018(3) dt.10-07-2019 2/2
the aforesaid order of the Managing Director, passed in compliance of the order of this Court.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
rinkee/-
U
Amleshwar Prasad
Shakti Kumar Negi
Pratyaya Amrit
Vinodanand Jha
R. Laxman
Tej Pratap Singh
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
