Dismissed

Harishchandra Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC2 Jan 2019MJC/4877/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt proceeding, the Patna High Court considered the respondent's reasoned order disposing of the petitioner's representation regarding pension dues. The court held it was not inclined to proceed further, dropped the contempt petition, and granted liberty to approach the authority regarding any calculation errors.

What did the court decide?

Contempt proceedings dropped; liberty granted to file a fresh representation regarding calculation errors within one month.

Harishchandra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4877 of 2014

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5886 of 2014

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Harishchandra Singh, Son of Late Nirdhan Singh, Resident of villageRampur Parori, P.O.- Banchauri, P.S.- Sitamarhi, District - Sitamarhi.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar.

¶9

Sri Shashi Shekhar Sharma, the Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Zila Parishad, Sitamarhi through Chief Executive Officer, namely Ravi Shankar Singh.

¶11

Sri Ravi Shankar Singh, the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sitamarhi.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Raisul Haque For the Zila Parishad : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶16

10 02-01-2019

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

The petitioner has filed the present application for initiating contempt proceeding for non-compliance of the direction issued by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 5886 of 2014.

¶19

This Court vide order dated 11.09.2014 has issued direction to the respondent no.5, i.e. Deputy Development Commissioner-cum- Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sitamarhi, to dispose of the representation of the petitioner by a reasoned order.

¶20

Today on behalf of opposite parties a show-cause has been filed enclosing the reasoned order dated 04.12.2018

¶21

Patna High Court MJC No.4877 of 2014(10) dt.02-01-2019 2/2

¶22

whereby a detailed calculation as to the pre and post retiral dues of the petitioner has been considered.

¶23

Considering the reasoned order dated 04.12.2018, the Court is not inclined to proceed any further in the matter. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding is dropped.

¶24

However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority in the event he is aggrieved by the error in calculation and if he is aggrieved by nonconsideration of any of his grievance by filing representation, which shall be disposed of by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of one month from the date of filing of such representation.

¶25

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶26

uday/-

¶27

Harishchandra Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harishchandra Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aurangjeb Kuraishi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Binay Kr. Mishra @ Binay Mishra and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Baliram Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rana Pratap Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Govt. Of Bihar, P

Chhavinath Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rakesh Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary R. K. Mahajan, Department Of Education, Governme