Allowed

Baliram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Dec 2018CR. MISC./73866/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge oral order granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 419, 406, and 420 of IPC, acknowledging inordinate delay and lack of antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C.

Baliram Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.73866 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2018 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Baliram Singh S/o Late Shiv Nandan Singh, Resident of Village- Meera Bigha P.S.-Alipur, District-Gaya At Present Posted in Gopalganj on the Post of Assistant Engineer (Qualify Control, Flood Control and & Drainage Division), Distt.-Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Manish Kumar 2 ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 21-12-2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

Petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with

¶15

Fatepur P.S. Case No. 92 of 2018 for the offence under sections 419, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He submits that the instant case was registered on 3.4.2018 in connection with irregularity in Manrega scheme 2006-2007.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in addition to inordinate delay of 11years in lodging the FIR. He submits that petitioner has absolutely no concern with the work in question as he has neither singed the measurement book nor

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.73866 of 2018(2) dt.21-12-2018 2/2

¶19

he has any role to play with regard to the estimate.

¶20

In para-10 there is specific plea that the work was done by Vishwanath Singh, JE who has signed on that paper and nothing was done by the petitioner in connection with Manrega scheme.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Xth, Gaya, in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 92 of 2018 (G.R. No. 2086/2018) subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be government employee including the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶23

Ravi/-

¶24

U T

Baliram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baliram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudama Pandey and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gulam Gaush Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kunal Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Aurangjeb Kuraishi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Binay Kr. Mishra @ Binay Mishra and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Saxena @ Sonu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar