Oral order disposing a miscellaneous application where the court held that opposite parties had decided the claim and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No further proceedings initiated.
Present application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3250 of 2018 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16955 of 2016
======================================================
Priya Ranjan Prasad Son of Late Shambhu Prasad Resident of MohallaChandmari Balutal Near, Sapahi Mandir, P.S.- Motihari, District- East Champaran. at posted as Lecturer Economic, in the Hari Shankar Verma Cooperative Inter College, Ramgarhwa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jai Prakash Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shrimati Shilpa Singh Ga 12 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 07-03-2019
Considering the fact that opposite parties have decided the claim of the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to proceed any further particularly in view of the fact that writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
If the petitioner is aggrieved by any decision, he may approach the appropriate forum, if law permits.
With the aforesaid, the present application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/-
U
Priya Ranjan Prasad
The State Of Bihar
ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
