Disposal of a contempt application wherein the Court observed that the earlier order has been complied with. No further order was required except liberty to challenge the disposal.
Petitioner granted liberty to challenge the disposal if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2357 of 2018 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.839 of 2012
======================================================
Syed Alay Athar, Son of Late Syed Alay Hyder, resident of C/o Shahabur Rahman, Mohalla- Majhauli Khetal, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner
... ... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Abhinav Srivastava, Advocate. For the O.P. Nos. 2 & 3 : Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agarwal, B.R.A. Bihar University. For the State : Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, A.C. to A.A.G. 15. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 01-05-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 and 3 that the order dated 01.09.2017, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 839 of 2012, has already been complied with.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, no further order is required to be passed in the present application. However, the petitioner will be liberty to challenge the order, if he is aggrieved with the same.
Patna High Court MJC No.2357 of 2018(2) dt.01-05-2019 2/2
The present contempt application stands disposed of.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U.K./-
U
Syed Alay Athar
The State of Bihar through Shri R. K. Mahajan
Dr. Amarendra Yadav
Dr. Vivekanand Shukla
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
