Disposed

Bishnu Kumar @ Prem Kumar and Ors. v. The Union Of India

Patna HC26 Mar 2019MJC/2180/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral order dropped proceedings in a writ petition regarding ministry of defence arrears/calculation disputes without adjudication, granting liberty to approach the competent authority if aggrieved. Proceeding disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to approach competent authority if aggrieved by calculation of arrears; present proceeding stood disposed of.

Bishnu Kumar @ Prem Kumar and Ors. Vs The Union Of India — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2180 of 2017

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5119 of 2006

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Bishnu Kumar @ Prem Kumar and Ors Son of Late Kaushaliya Devi, and L/NK S.N. Kumar Resident of Village- Dilwarpur, P.S.-Kalyanpur, DistrictEast Champaran

¶6

Pinki devi Daughter of Late Kaushaliya devi and L/Nk S.N. Kumar No.14522189 Unit 8(1) fd Coy, Resident of Village-Dilwarpur, P.S.Kalyanpur, District-East Champaran

¶7

Poonam Devi Daughter of Late Kaushaliya Devi nad L/NK S.N. Kumar No.14522189 Unit 8 (I) fd Coy, Resident of Village-Dilwarpur, P.S.Kalyanpur, District-East Champaran

¶8

Rinku Devi, Daughter of Late Kaushaliya Devi Resident of VillageDilwarpur, P.S.-Kalyanpur, District-East Champaran

¶9

... ... Petitioner/s

¶10

Versus

¶11

The Union Of India through the Ministry of Defence, New Delhi.

¶12

Lt. Colonel K.C. Rao Record Officer, Bengal, Engineer Good, Roorke No. 247667

¶13

Lt. Hen. Abhay Krishna Major Commanding Officer, B (I) Fd. Coy, C/o 99 APo Calcutta.

¶14

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhitabh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.S.D Sanjay Addl. Soc. Gen.

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶20

5 26-03-2019 Considering the stand taken by the opposite parties in

¶21

their show-cause, no further indulgence is required. Accordingly, the present proceeding is dropped.

¶22

However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner, if

¶23

he aggrieved by the calculation of the arrears and non-payment of any of the admitted dues, he may approach the competent authority along with copy of this order. The opposite party shall

¶24

Patna High Court MJC No.2180 of 2017(5) dt.26-03-2019 2/2

¶25

address the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order at the earliest.

¶26

With the aforesaid liberty the present proceeding stands disposed of.

¶27

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶28

T.Kr./-

¶29

Bishnu Kumar @ Prem Kumar and Ors. v. The Union Of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bishnu Kumar @ Prem Kumar and Ors. v. The Union Of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Rajak @ Kailla Rajak Vs The State of Bihar

Pramod Musahar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Imtiyaz @ Imtaz Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Nayan Tara Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Briksha Pandit and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.