Oral order disposing of a contempt petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to challenge the opposite parties' order before the appropriate forum or court in appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2051 of 2015
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7602 of 2012
======================================================
Sudha Kant Pathak Son of Late Chandra Kant Pathak R/o Village Gajhara, P.S. Ladania, District Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opp.Parties : Mr.Gp22 G.P. Ojha ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
Considering the scope of contempt jurisdiction,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to challenge the order passed by the opposite parties in appropriate proceeding.
The contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter before the appropriate forum/court in appropriate proceeding.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner may be granted liberty to challenge the impugned order in appropriate proceedings.
Sudha Kant Pathak
The State of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department, Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
