Dismissed

Dilip Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC9 Dec 2019MJC/203/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to initiate contempt proceedings for non-compliance of an earlier order. The court held that the encroachment had been removed on 07.06.2019, finding that the previous order was complied with and dismissed the application. Quality: thin

What did the court decide?

Dismissed the application for initiating contempt proceedings as the earlier order was complied with.

Dilip Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.203 of 2018 In

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18961 of 2016

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dilip Kumar Singh, Son of Late Suresh Prasad Singh resident of Village - Bariyarpur, P.S. Baliya, District - Begusarai.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

Mr. Naushad Yusuf, The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

¶9

Sri Braj Kishore Choudhary, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Begusarai.

¶10

Smt. Bibha Rani, The Circle Officer, Baliya, District - Begusarai.

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suraj Narain Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Khurshid Alam - Aag 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and

¶13

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶14

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶15

3 09-12-2019 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief:

¶16

“For initiating a contempt proceeding against the Opposite Parties for violation and non-compliance of order dated 27.04.2017 in CWJC No. 18961 of 2016 passed by the then Hon’ble the Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh and to punish them suitably for committing contempt of this Hon’ble Court.”

¶17

From the averments made in para-4 of the affidavit,

¶18

which is being reproduced hereinbelow:

¶19

“4. That it is further important to mention here that the compliance of order dt. 27.04.2017 passed in CWJC No. 18961 of 2016 practically

¶20

Patna High Court MJC No.203 of 2018(3) dt.09-12-2019

¶21

2/2

¶22

complied on 07.06.2019 by deploying Magistrate and Police Force according to requirement (copy of report of clearance of encroachment dt. 07.06.2019 of C.O., Ballia, in compliance of order dt. 27.04.2017 passed in CWJC No. 18961 of 2016 has been annexed herewith and marked Annexure-1). It is further submitted that the aforesaid encroached public land is now free from encroachment (photographs of the spot showing the public land free has been annexed herewith as Annexure-2)”,

¶23

it is evident that the directions contained in order dated 27.04.2017 passed in CWJC No. 18961 of 2016, titled as Dilip Kumar Singh vs. The State of Bihar & Ors., stand complied with as all encroachments from the public land stand removed with the help of police force.

¶24

The application stands disposed of.

¶25

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶26

( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶27

sujit/-

¶28

Dilip Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonelal Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mantu Kumar Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar

Chandra Mohan Jha, Vs The State of Bihar

Satendra Kumar Shandlya Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arvind Kumar Singh @ Arvind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Baba Rajaram Das Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.