This court disposed of a contempt petition filed against respondents for alleged willful disobedience of a previous order. The court accepted the respondents' submission that the earlier order was complied with.
The contempt petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1845 of 2018 In
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2828 of 2011
====================================================== Dr. Sharad Kumar Son of Shri Brajnandan Prasad Yadav, Resident of Ram Dulari Vatika, Kushumpuram, Gola Road, Opposite Patliputra Railway Station, Patna Permanent address- Hisua Ward No.1, Guruchak, Khairatibigha, Gaya Road Petrol Pump, Hisua, District- Nawada, Bihar805103.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Parties: Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-04-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the opposite parties.
Patna High Court MJC No.1845 of 2018 dt.08-04-2019 2/2
party nos. 4 and 5, Annexure-A whereof being an order dated 26.07.2018 discloses that a final decision has been taken by the authorities and thus it is submitted that the order of this Court stands complied with.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date | 09.04.2019 |
| Transmission Date | N.A. |
Dr. Sharad Kumar
The State of Bihar
Shri R.L. Chongthu
Shri Khalid Mirza
Magadh University
Tappan Kumar Sandilya
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
