Allowed

Md. Reyaz @ Md. Reyaz Ahmad @ Reyaz Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Apr 2019CR. MISC./21356/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case alleging offences under Sections 341, 323, and 354(B) IPC. The court released him on ₹10,000 bail with conditions including cooperation with investigation and physical presence in court.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to conditions of cooperation, physical presence, and no new offences.

Md. Reyaz @ Md. Reyaz Ahmad @ Reyaz Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21356 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2017 Thana- BISFI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. REYAZ @ MD. REYAZ AHMAD @ REYAZ AHMAD Son of Md. Israeel Resident of Village- Bhatoura, P.S.- Bisfi, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rashid Izhar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 05-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 354(B) IPC registered in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 307/2017.

¶13

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the informant’s side is in the habit of filing cases against the petitioner’s side and the parties are agnates. There is ongoing land dispute between them in respect of which father-in-law of the informant had filed Case No. 54 of 2014 (Annexure-2). Thereafter an FIR in Bisfi P.S. Case No. 56 of 2016 was filed by the nanad of the informant (Annexure-3). The petitioner has also filed Bisfi P.S. Case No. 302 of 2017 against the informant’s side on 11.12.2017 for the occurrence on the same day. In retaliation to the same, the present FIR has been filed on 18.12.2017 without explanation for such delay. It is therefore, submitted that the accusations are completely false and motivated. Except the aforesaid Bisfi P.S. Case No. 56 of 2016 the petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶14

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21356 of 2019(2) dt.05-04-2019 2/2

¶16

communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Madhubani in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 307/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶17

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶18

ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶19

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶20

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶21

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶22

Chandran/-

¶23

U T

Md. Reyaz @ Md. Reyaz Ahmad @ Reyaz Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Reyaz @ Md. Reyaz Ahmad @ Reyaz Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girgita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Upendra Chaudhary and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Rai @ Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Kumar Sah @ Virendra Sah Vs The State of Bihar