The petitioner conceded that the order of the writ court was complied with. The present proceeding was dropped as the application was disposed of on the application itself.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1587 of 2017
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16710 of 2015
======================================================
Chandrika Prasad Singh @ C. P. Singh Son of Late Haribansh Narayan Singh, Resident of Village-Manas Naya Panapur P.S.-Akilpur District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Usha Kumari Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma - Aag 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
3 14-02-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that the order of the writ court has been complied with.
In view of the above, the present proceeding is dropped. The application stands disposed of.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
Ravi/-
U
Chandrika Prasad Singh @ C. P. Singh
The State Of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
