This criminal miscellaneous petition sought bail for the petitioner. The High Court, with the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Upadhyay, rejected the bail prayer due to allegations. The court directed the trial court to expedite the trial and conclude within six months.
Bail prayer rejected; trial to be concluded within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.8448 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2018 Thana- SARAI District- Vaishali
======================================================
Jitendra Paswan S/O- Late Fakira Paswan. Resident of Village Khas Patedha,P.S.- Sarai, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Ranjan No.Ii For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rana Randhir Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
2 13-02-2019 Having regard to the specific allegation levelled against the petitioner by the prosecutrix, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail, is hereby rejected.
However, trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same after completing all formalities within a period of six months.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
T.Kr./-
U T
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the specific allegation by the prosecutrix.
Whether the trial court should be directed to expedite the trial.
Whether the trial can be concluded within six months.
Jitendra Paswan
The State Of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
