This court dismissed a civil miscellaneous application filed by the petitioner. The advocate submitted that the application had become infructuous due to delay, leading to rejection without further proceedings.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1931 of 2018
======================================================
Yogendra Pandit Son of Late Gokhula Pandit Resident of of Village - Banjari, P.O. P.S. District - Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
All are resident of village-Sareya Ward No. 4, Yadopur Road, P. O. + P.S. + Distt. Sareya Ward No. 4, Yadopur Road, P. O. + P.S. + DistrictGopalganj, at present residing at Muniya Chauk, Gopalganj, P.S. + DistrictGopalganj.
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Satya Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
At the outset, Mr. Satya Ranjan Sinha, learned
advocate appearing for the petitioner submitted that due to efflux of time, the application has become infructuous.
In view of the submission made above, the application is dismissed.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
kanchan/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application can be allowed despite the efflux of time.
Yogendra Pandit
Baharatjee Prasad
Kishnawati Devi
Kanti Devi
Deeput Kumar
Guddu Kumar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
