Allowed

Mani Kant Panjiyara v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jul 2019CWJC/8838/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a petitioner's appeal for the provisional release of an auto vehicle seized under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The Court directed release upon production of ownership documents and two sureties, subject to the initiation of confiscation proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Provisional release of vehicle BR10P/6699 allowed upon production of ownership, registration, and two sureties, subject to initiation of confiscation proceedings.

Mani Kant Panjiyara Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8838 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Mani Kant Panjiyara S/o Rameshwar Panjiyara Resident of Village Rahmatpur Basa Asarganj, P.S. Asarganj, District Munger.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary of Excise, Govt. of Bihar at Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate, (D.M), Munger.

¶8

The Superintendent of Excise District, Munger.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police (S.P.), Munger.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Kumar Choudhary For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kumar Manish (Sc5)

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN

¶14

and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶15

Date : 11-07-2019

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶17

The petitioner is owner of the vehicle and prays for provisional release of the Piaggio Ape Auto bearing registration No. BR10P/6699, Engine No. WIM3253545, Chassis No. ZFNM435829, which has been seized in connection with Asarganj P.S. Case No. 126 of 2017 for the offences punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶18

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated and the vehicle is

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.8838 of 2019 dt.11-07-2019 2/3

¶20

lying under the open sky in the police station. The seizure list supports the seizure of the motorcycle and 5 litres of IMFL and 600 ml. of Country liquor.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the designated court below with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/ undertakings:

¶22

(i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.

¶23

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.8838 of 2019 dt.11-07-2019 3/3

¶25

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

¶26

(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared by the designated court below wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

¶27

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would however be subject to initiation and finalization of the confiscation proceeding, if any.

¶28

With the observations above, this writ petition is allowed.

¶29

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶30

( Partha Sarthy, J)

¶31

sushma/-

¶32

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	22.7.19
Transmission Date	NA

Mani Kant Panjiyara v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mani Kant Panjiyara v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amir Hassan Vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna and Ors.

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sahdev Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prabhat Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Munindar Tripathi Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotan Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar