Allowed

Prabhat Ranjan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jul 2019CWJC/8227/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna allowed the writ petition seeking provisional release of a seized vehicle. The court directed release subject to security and undertakings, making it conditional on the finalization of pending confiscation proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Directing release of the vehicle provisionally subject to security, undertakings, and subject to finalization of confiscation proceedings.

Prabhat Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8227 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Prabhat Ranjan Son of Jagnnath Singh @ Jagarnath Singh Resident of Village- Chakmajahid, Ward No.01, P.S.- Mahuwa, District- Vaishali

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

¶8

The Superintendent of Police, Lakhisarai.

¶9

The Police Inspector-cum-Officer In-Charge, Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) Police Station, District- Lakhisarai.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s

¶14

: Mr.Mrigendra Kumar : Mr.Kumar Manish (Sc5)

¶15

======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶17

Date : 11-07-2019

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Counsel for the State.

¶19

The petitioner is the owner of the Mahindra Bolero and prays for provisional release of the said vehicle bearing Registration No. BR31PA1373, Chassis No. MA1XA2GHKF5E54066, Engine No. GHF4D73481 which has been seized in connection with Lakhisarai (Kabaiya) P.S. Case No. 375 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 32(b) and 38(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶20

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that confiscation proceeding is pending and the vehicle is lying under the open sky in the police station. The seizure list reflects the seizure of

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.8227 of 2019 dt.11-07-2019 2/3

¶22

156 litres of beer cans.

¶23

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is pending, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the District Magistrate, Lakhisarai with one surety along with a Bank Guarantee or original title deed of immovable property situated within the district to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the surety and the bank guarantee or the original title deed, as the case may be, shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:

¶24

(I) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.

¶25

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

¶26

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

¶27

(iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama

¶28

Patna High Court CWJC No.8227 of 2019 dt.11-07-2019 3/3

¶29

would be prepared by the District Magistrate, Lakhisarai wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

¶30

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the one surety along with a Bank Guarantee or the original title deed of immovable property situated in the district, as the case may be, to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document and the undertakings, as stated above. This release would, however, be subject to finalization of the confiscation proceeding. The title deed papers shall remain in safe custody of the confiscating authority subject to final decision in the confiscation proceedings.

¶31

The writ petition is allowed.

¶32

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶33

( Partha Sarthy, J)

¶34

sushma/-

¶35

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	22.7.19
Transmission Date	NA

Prabhat Ranjan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhat Ranjan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amir Hassan Vs The High Court Of Judicature At Patna and Ors.

Umesh Kumar @ Umesh Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sahdev Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mani Kant Panjiyara Vs The State of Bihar

Munindar Tripathi Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotan Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar