The High Court at Patna dismissed the writ petition as a whole for lack of prosecution due to the non-availability of respondent no. 9, who had failed to comply with a peremptory order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7368 of 2013
======================================================
Rajeshwari Sahani Wife of Krishna Sahani Resident of Village Marikpur Millik, Police Station Madhuban, District East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raghwanand For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prahlad Kr. Bhagat ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
3 21-06-2019 The office has pointed out that the present writ petition has stood rejected on 28.07.2014 as against the respondent no. 9 on account of non-compliance of the peremptory order of this Court dated 21.07.2014.
This Court finds that in absence of respondent no. 9, the relief prayed for by the petitioner herein, cannot be granted. Hence, the writ petition as a whole stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
S.Sb/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be adjudicated without the presence of respondent no.9.
Rajeshwari Sahani
The State of Bihar
The District Education Officer, East Champaran
Pramukh, Panchayat Samiti, Block Madhuban
Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Garahia
Umesh Chandra Shiv
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
