The Single Judge allowed the petitioner's request for liberty to withdraw the writ application due to pending Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to withdraw the writ application; case disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.676 of 2019
======================================================
Nagina Khatoon @ Nagina
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar & Ors
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Siyaram Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr.S.Raza Ahmad -Aag5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER
2 10-01-2019
learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner informs that the SLP is already pending against the order passed in MJC No.3325 of 2015 in CWJC No.83 of 2015 i.e., the order of the Division Bench before the Apex Court.
Under such information, he seeks liberty to withdraw the writ application. The writ application is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
(Nilu Agrawal, J)
B.Kr./-
U
Nagina Khatoon @ Nagina
The State Of Bihar
NILU AGRAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
