The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by five petitioners challenging recruitment without merits. The court found the case infructuous due to substantive appointment and dismissed it for want of prosecution as no representatives appeared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5856 of 2015
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Gp8- Manish Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
It is submitted by State counsel that all the five petitioners have been appointed on vacant Class IV posts and posted at Bihar College of Engineering, Bhagalpur during pendency of the writ petition. It is submitted that in view of the said development, the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5856 of 2015(2) dt.26-02-2019 2/2
Since none appears for the petitioners, without going into merits of the submissions made by the State counsel, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
Prakash/-
U
Brahmdeo Mandal and Ors
The State Of Bihar and Ors
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
