Disposed

Society of Educational and Regional Cultural Heritage (Search) Society v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC25 Mar 2019CWJC/5432/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner approached for mandamus directing inquiry into lack of infrastructure of some colleges. Court noted no prior approach to competent authority by petitioner.Disposed of petition with liberty to file appropriate application to State Government.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner given liberty to approach State Government to file grievance application regarding infrastructure.

Society of Educational and Regional Cultural Heritage… — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5432 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Society of Educational and Regional Cultural Heritage (Search) Society Registered under Society Registration Act, 1860, having its Registered office at 1st Floor, Tridev Market, Ram Nagari More, Ashiyana Nagar, P.S. Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna, through its Secretary Priya Kumari (Female) aged about 42 years Wife of Jagdish Das, Resident of Educational Land Regional Cultural Heritage (Search), First Floor, Tridev Market, Ram Nagari More, Ashiyana Nagar, P.S. Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Primary, Secondary and Higher Education, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Director, Primary, Secondary and Higher Education, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The vice-Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar.

¶11

The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar.

¶12

The Union of India, through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Department of School Education and Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶13

The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Department of School Education and Literacy, New Delhi.

¶14

The Under Secretary (CS) National Council for Teacher Education, Hans Bhawan, Wing-II, Bahadurshah Zafar, New Delhi- 110002.

¶15

The Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee, National Council for Teacher Education, 15 Neel Kantha Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubneshwar, Orissa.

¶16

The Secretary, Magadh Teachers Training B.Ed. College, Dani Bigha, NH-2, Old G.T. Road, P.O.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.

¶17

The Secretary, Almomin College of Education, P.O.- Bishunpur, Via- Chit Ki Pur, District- Gaya.

¶18

The Secretary, Nazmia College of Education, Jamaluddin Chak, Gurgaon Model Colony, New Bailey Road, Near Saguna More, Danapur, P.O. Khagaul, District- Patna.

¶19

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, AC to AAG-15 For Union of India : Ms. Nivedita Nirvikar, Adv. ======================================================

¶20

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.5432 of 2019(2) dt.25-03-2019 2/2

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN)

¶24

2 25-03-2019 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

¶25

Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, learned AC to AAG-15, in reference to the pleadings submits that without even approaching the competent authority in the State Government to examine the grievances by filing an appropriate application that the petitioner is before this Court seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus for holding an enquiry into the functioning of respnodents no. 11 to 13 on their lack of infrastructure to conduct Teachers Training Course.

¶26

Submission of Mr. Tiwary is supported from the pleadings which lacks any such approach by the petitioner before the State Government in its Education Department.

¶27

In the circumstances and for the present we dispose of this writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner to first approach the State Government for their grievance and it goes without saying that any such application being filed by the petitioner with supporting facts and figures would be disposed of within three months of its filing.

¶28

With the aforementioned observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶29

(Jyoti Saran, J)

¶30

( Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶31

Surendra/- U

Society of Educational and Regional Cultural Heritage (Search) Society v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Society of Educational and Regional Cultural Heritage (Search) Society v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Choudhary @ Vijay Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pramod Chsoudhary Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

The Bauram Gram Vikash Samiti and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramji Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s surat dreams and Anr. Vs the Union of India and Ors.