Petitioner sought withdrawal of application regarding redressed grievance. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed writ petition as infructuous.
Permission granted to withdraw the application; writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 4963 of 2016
======================================================
Chandra Bhushan Singh Son of Late Mokhtar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Akhtiyarpur, P.O Marwan, P.S. Karja, District- Muzaffarpur, the retired Asistant Engineer, Minor Irrigation Sub-Division, Dalsingsarai, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr S Raza Ahmad, AAG IX
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
2 29-01-2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this application as grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and seeks permission to withdraw it. Permission is granted.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
U
Chandra Bhushan Singh
State Of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
