Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition alleging grievance redressal. Court accorded permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission accorded to withdraw the writ petition; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 11707 of 2014
======================================================
Bharat Ram Son of late Manuki Ram, resident of Mohalla- Chandpur Bela, Anil Bhawan Gali, Sipara, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
For the Petitioner/s : Mr Prabhu Nath Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Dhruba Mukherjee, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2019
In presence of learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed during pendency of the writ petition and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. Permission is accorded.
This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
U
Bharat Ram
The State Of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Joint Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Joint Secretary, Personnel & Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
