The writ application stands disposed of as having become infructuous because the petitioner agreed his grievance was redressed after perusing the counter affidavit.
The writ application is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4201 of 2017
======================================================
Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Son of B.B. Srivastava resident of village Naya Bazar, Yamuna Kothi, Police Station - Kotwali, Anchal - Jagdishpur, Subdivision - Sadar, District - Bhagalpur and presently residing at flat no. 5/7, Sarvpria Vihar, Police Station Malviya Nagar, New Delhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pritish Kumar Lal For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sajid Salim Khan- SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
ORAL ORDER
State of Bihar, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees, after having perused the counter affidavit, with particular reference to paragraph 6 thereof that his grievance stands redressed.
This writ application, thus, stands disposed of as
having become infructuous.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
HR/-
U
Rajesh Kumar Srivastava
State of Bihar
Chakradhari Sharan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
