Disposed

Chulhiya Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC12 Mar 2019CWJC/9701/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused to issue a direction for rent receipt issuance, holding the petitioner has a statutory remedy under Bihar Right to Public Service Act, 2011 and Bihar Right to Public Grievance Redressal Act, 2015, and directed authorities to dispose of the application within statutory time.

What did the court decide?

No direction for rent receipt; petitioner directed to approach authorities under BPSPA/BRPGRA and case to be disposed of within statutory time.

Chulhiya Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Patna HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9701 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Chulhiya Devi wife of Sukh Chain Shani resident of village - Sahargama, P.S. - Parihar, District - Sitamarhi.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Director, Revenue Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Collector, Sitamarhi

¶8

The Deputy Collector, Land Reform, Sitamarhi.

¶9

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sitamarhi.

¶10

The Circle Officer, Parihar, Sitamarhi.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Murari Mr.Vijay Kumar Mishra For the State : Mr.R.K. Roy- GP-18 Mr. Mukul Prasad, AC to GP 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 12-03-2019 Heard.

¶15

The petitioner seeks a direction to the Circle Officer,

¶16

Parihar, Sitamarhi to accept rent and issue rent receipt in favour of the petitioner, in the light of the decree passed in her favour in Title Suit No. 356 of 2013, in respect of the land bearing Khata No. 275, Khesra No.183, area 04 decimal of Mauza Sahargama in the district of Sitamarhi.

¶17

It is stated in paragraph 5 of the writ application that a mutation case was filed, giving rise to Mutation Case No. 3379 of 2012-13 which, too, has been decided in favour of the

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.9701 of 2017(3) dt.12-03-2019 2/2

¶19

petitioner, but the rent receipt has not yet been issued.

¶20

Considering the nature of the grievance, which the petitioner has raised in the present writ application, in my view, she has a statutory remedy under the Bihar Right to Public Service Act, 2011/Bihar Right to Public Grievance Redressal Act, 2015, which she may avail.

¶21

It is directed that if the petitioner makes an application under either of the provisions of the Act(s), her application shall be considered and disposed of within the statutory time prescribed under the Act(s) or the Rules framed thereunder.

¶22

The writ application is disposed of accordingly.

¶23

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶24

HR/-

¶25

Chulhiya Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chulhiya Devi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Amjad @ Munna @ Md. Ajmad Vs The State of Bihar

Deva Nand Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Umesh Paswan and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Molai Sharma and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Surendra Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bhola Pandit and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar