Disposed

Sri Satyanarayan Singh Sathi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 May 2019CWJC/42/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to pay retirement dues, including gratuity, leave encashment, interest, and additional deputation pay. While gratuity was already paid, the Court granted liberty to the petitioner to seek the remaining due.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file representation for additional deputation pay; respondent directed to pay if due.

Sri Satyanarayan Singh Sathi Vs The State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.42 of 2017

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sri Satyanarayan Singh Sathi, Son of Late Khublal Singh, Resident of Village- Mangarpa, P.O. Gonai, Via- Asarganj, Police Station- Tarapur, District- Munger, At present Mohalla R/O Mohalla Azad Nagar, Gayatri Nagar, P.O. Purab Sarai, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Munger.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Engineering and Water Resources Development, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Gandak Area Development Agency Muzaffarpur, through its Chairman.

¶8

The Chairman- Cum- Commissioner, Gandak Area Development Agency, Muzaffarpur.

¶9

The Superintendent Engineer, Gandak Area Development Agency, Muzaffarpur.

¶10

The Executive Engineer, Gandak Area Development Agency, Motihari.

¶11

The Account Officer, Gandak Area Development Agency, Muzaffarpur.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr.Harish Kumar- GP-8 For the Respondents no.2to6 : Mr. Satish Chandra Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶14

5 17-05-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who retired on 28.02.2015 as Officiating Junior Engineer Gandak Area Development Agency, Muzaffarpur has filed the instant writ petition for direction to the respondents authorities to pay the retiral dues of the petitioner, such as, leave encashment and gratuity with statutory as well as penal interest at the rate of 18% per annum.

¶15

It is the case of the petitioner that besides above dues, the amount under the head of additional payment for deputation

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.42 of 2017(5) dt.17-05-2019 2/3

¶17

or officiating as Junior Engineer from 15.04.2010 to 28.02.2015 has also not been paid to the petitioner.

¶18

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.1 and a separate counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 6.

¶19

From perusal of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos.2 to 6, it transpires that the amount payable to the petitioner under the head of leave encashment and gratuity has already been paid to the petitioner, which is evident from letter no.144 dated 27.04.2017 issued by the Executive Engineer, Division Office Gandak Area Development Agency, Motihari, enclosed as Annexure-A to the counter affidavit of respondent nos. 2 to 6.

¶20

Further the said amount has been received by the petitioner and the copies of the receipt have also been brought on record as annexed to the said counter affidavit.

¶21

This writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that so far as the amount due under the head of ‘Additional Payment for Deputation or officiating as Junior Engineer from 15.04.2010 to 28.02.2015’ and interest for delayed payment is concerned, the petitioner will be at liberty to file a representation before the respondent no.3 within a period

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.42 of 2017(5) dt.17-05-2019 3/3

¶23

of three months from today. If such representation is filed along with the copy of this order, the respondent no.3 will pay the admitted dues under these heads to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of above representation.

¶24

In case, any dues is found not payable to the petitioner, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner by a reasoned order within the aforesaid period.

¶25

The writ application stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations and directions.

¶26

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶27

sudha/-sunil

¶28

Sri Satyanarayan Singh Sathi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Satyanarayan Singh Sathi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muniya Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Narayan Jha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shashibhushan Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kameshwar Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Girijesh Kumar Shrivastava Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Mojahid Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.