Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ application alleging grievances were redressed, which the court allowed.
Withdrawal of the writ application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11920 of 2017
======================================================
Shashibhushan Mishra son of Late Damodar Mishra, Resident of VillageDharmpur, P.O.- Silar, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Aurangabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan For the Respondent/s : Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadav -Gp23 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
2 15-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Respondents.
It is submitted by Mr.Rajeev Ranjan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the grievances of the petitioner made in the writ application have been redressed and as such, the petitioner does not want to pursue this petition.
Permission is sought for withdrawal of this writ application.
As prayed for on behalf of the petitioner, this application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
sudha/- U
Shashibhushan Mishra
The State Of Bihar
The Director, Secondary Education
The Secretary, Finance Department
District Magistrate, Gaya
District Education Officer, Gaya
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
