Writ petition filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner challenging certain orders. The petitioner submitted that the sought relief had become infructuous post-redressal, leading to its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4198 of 2015
======================================================
Mangal Prasad Singh S/o Late Ramlagan Singh, Resident of VillageBharaha, P.S.- Shyampur Bhataha, District - Sheohar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shally Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Manish Kumar, A.C. to AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
redressal of the relief claimed by the petitioner, the instant proceeding has become infructous .
This writ petition is dismissed as of infructous.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
sudha/-
U T
Mangal Prasad Singh
The State Of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Secretary, Minor Errigation Department Water Resources Deptt.
The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Motihari
The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Muzaffarpur
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
