Disposed
Reena Kumari v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCWJC/3224/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Patna High Court via oral order directed correction of a previous order's typographical mistake regarding respondent names.
What did the court decide?
Directed correction of party names of respondent nos. 10 and 11 in the order dated 26.06.2019.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3224 of 2019
¶2
======================================================
¶3
Reena Kumari Wife of Praduman Kumar Resident of Village- Sathiyari, P.O. Baniyakura, P.S. Katoriya, District- Banka.
¶4
... ... Petitioner/s
¶5
- Versus
¶6
- The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
¶7
- The Additional Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
¶8
- The Joint Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
¶9
- The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Banka.
¶10
- The District Officer Cum Chairman District Selection Committee, Banka.
¶11
- The District Supply Officer, Banka.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Reena Kumari
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
AI extract
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court