The petitioner failed to appear with advocates in the writ petition, indicating a lack of interest. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2241 of 2018
======================================================
Sikandar Paswan Son of Late Sonfi Paswan @ Late Sonafi Paswan, R/o Village- Mirzapur, P.O.- Dumra, P.S. and District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Partha Sarthi -Ga4
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
5 04-11-2019 Earlier on 18.4.2019, nobody had appeared for the petitioner. Today also, nobody appears for the petitioner to prosecute the writ petition, hence, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the present writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
ajay gupta/-
U
Sikandar Paswan
State Of Bihar
Collector, Sitamarhi
Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi
Additional Collector, Sitamarhi
Deputy Collector, General Administrative Section, District- Sitamarhi
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
