In a civil writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner, citing delay and laches, sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach departmental authorities. The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue grievances before departmental authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21519 of 2019
======================================================
Nathun Sharma, Son of Late Ghanshyam Sharma, resident of Village and P.O. Mau, Police Station- Tikari District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Subash Chandra Mishra ( Sc16 ) : Mr. Madhukar Mishra For A.G. Bihar : Mr. Ram Kinkar Choubey ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner, faced with the issue of delay and laches, seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to pursue his grievances before the departmental authorities.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
rinkee/- U
Nathun Sharma
The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna
The Collector, Gaya
The District Education Officer (Establishment), Gaya (DPO)
The District Education Officer (DEO), Gaya
The Block Education Officer, Tekari Gaya
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
