Disposed

Md. Peskar v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC22 Apr 2019CWJC/2085/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ application to pursue alternative statutory remedy before the Collector-cum-District Magistrate. The High Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate authority and dispose of the matter within a reasonable time.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw writ application with liberty to seek statutory remedy before the appropriate authority. Subsequent application by petitioner to be disposed of within reasonable time.

Md. Peskar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2085 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Md. Peskar, Aged about 31 years, Male, S/o Md. Abdul Kalam, Resident of Village-Chandghat,Panchayat-Khokha South,Block-Srinagar,P.S. srinagar,Sub Division-Sadar,Distt.-Purnea.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna.

¶7

The Chairman, District Level Selection Committee,Dist.-Purnea.

¶8

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate,Purnea.

¶9

The District Supply Officer, Purnea.

¶10

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar Purnea.

¶11

Smt. Premlata Kumari, W/o Sanjay Kumar, Residentof VillageFariyani,Panchayat-KhokhaSouth, Block-Srinagar, P.S.-Srinagar,Sub Division- Sadar, Dist.Purnea.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Anand, Adv. Ms. Preety Kunwar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arvind Ujjwal, SC 4. Mr. U.P.Singh, AC to SC 4.

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 22-04-2019 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would raise his grievance before the Collectorcum-District Magistrate, Purnea (Respondent No.3). For this reason learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty as prayed for.

¶17

Learned counsel for the State has no objection, if the petitioner is pursuing his remedy in accordance with law before an appropriate authority.

¶18

The writ application is disposed of as prayed for on

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.2085 of 2019(2) dt.22-04-2019 2/2

¶20

behalf of the petitioner with liberty aforesaid.

¶21

If the petitioner applies for a statutory remedy, the

¶22

same will be considered by the concerned respondent in accordance with law and will be disposed of within a reasonable time.

¶23

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶24

R.R.Ojha/-

¶25

Md. Peskar v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Peskar v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parivartankari Prarmbhik Sikshak Sangh Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Dushyant Kumar and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar

Kailash Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar Through the Secretary, Excise Department and Ors.

Shekh Md. Shahabuddin Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Veena Kumari @ Bina Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bipin Bihari Ram Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.