Disposed

Meena Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC17 Apr 2019CWJC/2032/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-paragraph oral order disposing of a writ petition regarding a payment claim. The court noted a counter-affidavit showed payment was made, disposed of the application, and reserved liberty to raise issues on any remaining dues despite a discharge executed by the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to raise issues regarding any remaining dues but barred from raising further claims due to executed discharge.

Meena Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2032 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Meena Kumari Shri Suresh Ray resident of Village- Hilalpur, P.S- Industrial Area Hajipur, District- Vaishali, Hajipur

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar and Ors through Principal secretary, Building Construction department, Government Of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Collector, Vaishali, Hajipur Bihar

¶8

The Executive Engineer, Vaishali Division, Hajipur, District- Vaishali Bihar

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Braj Kishore Singh Chouhan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Tripurari Nath Ambastha A.C. to Sc26 ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 17-04-2019 A counter affidavit has been filed today on behalf of the respondents. In paragraph 4 of the counter affidavit a categorical statement has bee made saying that the payment amounting to Rs. 572987/- has been made to the petitioner vide office voucher no. 111 dated 29.03.2019 by cheque bearing no. 818094 dated 30.03.2019. A copy of the voucher in this regard is placed on the record as Annexure ‘A’ to the counter affidavit.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although he has not received instruction in this regard but what is appearing from the counter affidavit cannot be controverted by him. Learned counsel however submits that in case any dues is still found remaining with the respondents the petitoner will be given liberty to raise all issues with the respondents.

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.2032 of 2019(2) dt.17-04-2019 2/2

¶16

This writ application is disposed of in the given facts and circumstances, however in case, it is found that the petitioner is not satisfied with the amount received from the respondents he will be at liberty to bring it to the notice of the competent authority. This order would however not be taken as liberty to the petitioner to raise any other and further claim for which he has already executed a discharge in favour of the respondents.

¶17

This writ application stands disposed of.

¶18

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶19

Rajeev/-

¶20

Meena Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meena Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashoka Kumar Patel Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Aziza Asgari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Akhileshwar Prasad Singh Vs The Regional manager, State Bank Of India and Ors.

Sayed Tasveer Mustafa Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Naresh Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.