Dismissed

Aziza Asgari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC16 Apr 2019CWJC/4275/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking a loan. Due to delay caused by the merger of the Gramin Bank, the Court directed the competent bank authority to decide the loan request within 60 days of receiving the order copy.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the competent authority of the Bank to decide the petitioner's loan request within 60 days of receipt of the order.

Aziza Asgari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4275 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Aziza Asgari, aged about 37 years, Gender-Female, Wife of Mohd. Safdar Imam, R/o Village-Mohammadpur, Ward No. 7, Teghra Nagar Panchayat, P.O.-Teghra, District Begusarai

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar.

¶7

The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate Begusarai.

¶9

The District Development Commissioner Begusarai.

¶10

Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank through the Branch Manager, Teghra Branch, Begusarai.

¶11

The Branch Manager, Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Teghra Branch, Begusarai.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kumar Praveen, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC 3. Mr. Ravi Ranjan Kumar Singh, AC to SC 3. Mr. Bipin Kumar, AC to SC 3. Mr. Arjun Prasad, AC to SC 3.

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 16-04-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the Bank are present.

¶17

It is submitted that some delay has taken place in pursuing the request of the petitioner for grant of loan because of the intervening circumstances rising to merger of the Gramin Bank. Learned counsel submits that an appropriate decision in accordance with the scheme and the guidelines relevant to the request of the petitioner, shall be taken by the competent authority within a period of 60 days from the date of

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.4275 of 2019(2) dt.16-04-2019 2/2

¶19

receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶20

In view of the submissions made on behalf of the Bank, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority of the Bank to consider and take an appropriate decision on the request of the petitioner within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶21

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶22

R.R.Ojha/-

¶23

Aziza Asgari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aziza Asgari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghav Sharan Prasad Vs North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited and Ors.

Md. Junaid Alam Vs North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited and Ors.

Aman Kumar Vs North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited and Ors.

Ashoka Kumar Patel Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Akhileshwar Prasad Singh Vs The Regional manager, State Bank Of India and Ors.

M/s Sumangal Smelters Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs M/s Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority and Ors.